ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: Can webhook capture the field name that's being modified?I understand what you mean Mark, but by doing things your way, I think I would have to make hundreds of fields in the log table, and list every possible fields in the webhook. Is there simpler way, say using API_AddRecord? For example, with xml, <field fid="15">[Record ID#]</field> <field fid="16">%dbName%</field> <field fid="17"> </field> <field fid="10"> </field> <field fid="11"> </field> <field fid="12">%curuser%</field> field 17 is where to through in the field name, field 10 for old value, and field 11 for new value. (Yet don't know which field is going to be modified by the user, so it can be any field, and there are at least 50 fields). Thanks for your help. ------------------------------ Chaohan Li ------------------------------ Re: Can webhook capture the field name that's being modified?Hello Mark, Thank you for your information. What I currently have in mind is this: I currently have a few tables, then I created a child table that would log any changes made to the reports in these tables. In the log child table, I have a field named "Affected Field". Every webhook from each table should capture which field is being modified and through that field name to "Affected Field" in the log table. I am just not sure will webhook be able to do that? I don't think your solution will be a suitable one in this situation. ------------------------------ Chaohan Li ------------------------------ Can webhook capture the field name that's being modified?Hello, I am trying to set up a webhook to capture any changes to a record. I don't know which field is going to me modified by the user, therefore, I need the webhook to capture the field name that's being changed. My question is is it achievable with webhook? If it is achievable, how? Thank you. ------------------------------ Chaohan Li ------------------------------