Forum Discussion
- edcooperQrew Assistant CaptainI know I can add a 1, 2, 3 before each part in the table but I don't want to do that.
- QuickBaseCoachDQrew CaptainIf there is a finite list, you can make that field be a multiple choice field. Then you can have that field sorted on the order of he choices.
- QuickBaseCoachDQrew Captain... or just add a sort field to the table and sort on that field even if that field is not exposed on the report.
- edcooperQrew Assistant CaptainIt's a dropdown in the form which is a lookup via a relationship.
- QuickBaseCoachDQrew CaptainThe low tech solution is to put a sort field on the source table for the lookup, and bring that down in the lookup too.
- edcooperQrew Assistant CaptainI think since there is a finite number of items that don't change that a multiple choice field solution would be the least complicated.
I'll try that first.
Thanks for that idea. - edcooperQrew Assistant CaptainThe multiple choice field worked perfectly and took a very complicated solution to a very simple and manageable one.
Thanks so much!! - ElenaLarrabee1Qrew CaptainHi! I have a similar question, maybe you can help... When we put records into a grid report, it's really important that they stay in the physical place where they were inserted in relation to the other records in the report. (They're decor items broken out by general venue area, usually). Meaning that when we use the grid edit function, we put records in wherever they need to be in relation to one another, but I can't think of a simple solution to make them stay in that order when we exit grid edit mode... Any ideas?
- QuickBaseCoachDQrew CaptainHave you tried simply sorting by Record ID#?
- ElenaLarrabee1Qrew CaptainI could, but I don't think that would work... We go back in and edit/add records, but often we add things in the middle of the list, if it were sorted by record ID, the items we add in later would just go to the bottom (or top) of the pile, right?