Forum Discussion
EvanMartinez
8 years agoModerator
Mark would be correct with the release this weekend all existing Formula - Text fields did get converted over to the Rich Text field type and going forward Rich Text would be the option you would want for any Formula - Text fields that would have had HTML enabled.
In your instance David did it break a form rule to copy text into a rich text field or was it a form rule copying text out of a rich text field? If this behavior is persisting we would certainly love to know about it so that we can look into it, since this was a significant change we are trying to find any issues or bugs that may have come up with the field type being opened up.
In your instance David did it break a form rule to copy text into a rich text field or was it a form rule copying text out of a rich text field? If this behavior is persisting we would certainly love to know about it so that we can look into it, since this was a significant change we are trying to find any issues or bugs that may have come up with the field type being opened up.
DavidJung
8 years agoQrew Assistant Captain
Evan--
It is copying from a rich text formula from a linked table.
I have a table with a RT-formula field that I use as a template, then in the linked table, the form rule copies that linked field info into a RT-text field for the user to further edit. So maybe it is that it is from another table, but I doubt it. In the past, when I've used js to create an rich text editing tool, I had similar problems.
It is copying from a rich text formula from a linked table.
I have a table with a RT-formula field that I use as a template, then in the linked table, the form rule copies that linked field info into a RT-text field for the user to further edit. So maybe it is that it is from another table, but I doubt it. In the past, when I've used js to create an rich text editing tool, I had similar problems.