Forum Discussion
EdwardHefter
3 years agoQrew Cadet
Thanks Jen,
It's a good idea and it's worked for me in the past, but it didn't work this time. It seems like the pipeline is actually trying to put the text "{{e.id}}" or "{{e.id|int}}" into the number field, rather than the record number itself. I'll upload pix in response to Prashant's post.
------------------------------
Edward Hefter
www.Sutubra.com
------------------------------
It's a good idea and it's worked for me in the past, but it didn't work this time. It seems like the pipeline is actually trying to put the text "{{e.id}}" or "{{e.id|int}}" into the number field, rather than the record number itself. I'll upload pix in response to Prashant's post.
------------------------------
Edward Hefter
www.Sutubra.com
------------------------------
PrashantMaheshw
3 years agoQrew Captain
Honestly the [pipeline] looks simple enough,
I would definitely try to run a smaller pipeline for my scenario 2 , Which means the filter of is empty is not working , Or at least reverse the scenario where we check for [pipeline] is empty
.making sense ??
------------------------------
Prashant Maheshwari
------------------------------
I would definitely try to run a smaller pipeline for my scenario 2 , Which means the filter of is empty is not working , Or at least reverse the scenario where we check for [pipeline] is empty
.making sense ??
------------------------------
Prashant Maheshwari
------------------------------