Forum Discussion
MichaelBarrow
7 years agoQrew Cadet
Not sure I understand your response. You say you have a relationship between these to tables. So adding an additional lookup field will take very little effort. If you want its value to be available in table B, why do you even need a separate field in table B which is essentially the same thing. If you were to use an Action, you would effectively be forcing yourself to use that value from table A just the same. If you have additional logic that needs to get incorporated into the setting of table B fields, you can change the destination field to be a formula that can incorporate what's getting passed from table A's lookup field, along with any other fields in table B.