Forum Discussion
MarkShnier__You
Qrew Legend
5 years agoWhy do you say this?
but then the next summary up to the grandparent wont work correctly
I'm quite sure that you can do a Combined Text Summary of a Combined Text Summary field.
------------------------------
Mark Shnier (YQC)
Quick Base Solution Provider
Your Quick Base Coach
http://QuickBaseCoach.com
mark.shnier@gmail.com
------------------------------
but then the next summary up to the grandparent wont work correctly
I'm quite sure that you can do a Combined Text Summary of a Combined Text Summary field.
------------------------------
Mark Shnier (YQC)
Quick Base Solution Provider
Your Quick Base Coach
http://QuickBaseCoach.com
mark.shnier@gmail.com
------------------------------
MichaelTamoush
5 years agoQrew Captain
I made an incorrect assumption when I stated that. I assumed the following:
Grandchildren were project Types. Lets say Type A, Type B, Type C, Type D
Parent 1 had Children: Type A, Type B
Parent 2 had Children: Type A, Type C
Combined Text Summary on Parent 1: "Type A; Type B"
Combined Text Summary on Parent 2: "Type A; Type C"
Assumed Combined Text Summary on Grandparent: "Type A Type B; Type A Type C"
Desired Combined Text on Grandparent: "Type A;Type B; Type C"
I figured QB would see the combined text as strings, and return like/unlike strings. However, turns out it is smarter than I gave it credit for and it still looks as all the entries individually, so like you are describing, I can simply use a combined text of a combined text.
------------------------------
Mike Tamoush
------------------------------
Grandchildren were project Types. Lets say Type A, Type B, Type C, Type D
Parent 1 had Children: Type A, Type B
Parent 2 had Children: Type A, Type C
Combined Text Summary on Parent 1: "Type A; Type B"
Combined Text Summary on Parent 2: "Type A; Type C"
Assumed Combined Text Summary on Grandparent: "Type A Type B; Type A Type C"
Desired Combined Text on Grandparent: "Type A;Type B; Type C"
I figured QB would see the combined text as strings, and return like/unlike strings. However, turns out it is smarter than I gave it credit for and it still looks as all the entries individually, so like you are describing, I can simply use a combined text of a combined text.
------------------------------
Mike Tamoush
------------------------------