MattMatt
8 years agoQrew Trainee
Structuring multiple tables with similar characteristics
Hi all,
I have a question about structuring multiple tables with similar characteristics.
What I mean by this is I used to have several tables which I consolidated into three because I realised I could structure them consistently - "categories"; "groupings"; "tags". The nature of the data in the old tables was different, the categories covered countries, services, methodologies, therapy areas etc. Our DB centers around one table in particular - "projects". The idea was all of the aforementioned categories has it's own tags which can be added to a project to try and find it again in the future.
I have just overhauled the "therapy areas" part (I work in healthcare so these are essentially standardised lists of diseases) and in doing so they really don't fit within the three-tier hierarchy. I also need to do the same with another of the categories so my consolidation is getting more fragmented. My (convoluted) question is - should I keep the other "tags" as they are, or separate all out into respective tables? Note, they would all be two two tables, one as a grouping and the other as the detail.
I hope this makes sense. Looking forward to hearing thoughts.
Matt
I have a question about structuring multiple tables with similar characteristics.
What I mean by this is I used to have several tables which I consolidated into three because I realised I could structure them consistently - "categories"; "groupings"; "tags". The nature of the data in the old tables was different, the categories covered countries, services, methodologies, therapy areas etc. Our DB centers around one table in particular - "projects". The idea was all of the aforementioned categories has it's own tags which can be added to a project to try and find it again in the future.
I have just overhauled the "therapy areas" part (I work in healthcare so these are essentially standardised lists of diseases) and in doing so they really don't fit within the three-tier hierarchy. I also need to do the same with another of the categories so my consolidation is getting more fragmented. My (convoluted) question is - should I keep the other "tags" as they are, or separate all out into respective tables? Note, they would all be two two tables, one as a grouping and the other as the detail.
I hope this makes sense. Looking forward to hearing thoughts.
Matt