Forum Discussion
ArchiveUser
8 years agoQrew Captain
Please feel free to add votes to the feature request. Maybe this will be the thing that gets a re-look at these limits.
I too like QB. Before this I was building a SharePoint site for the company and I liked the fact of the limits not being an issue. Need more space-buy more hardware or pay for more room on the cloud server. Nothing thrown away.
I even forgot to add, if you have a time/date field then QB throws away seconds. This is valuable data for my company as we do time series data collection in 15 or 30 second increments. That's a limit that doesn't need to exist-very Y2K to me. I did put a feature request in but there has been zero votes because apparently my company is the only ones that needs this data.
Ever onwards!
I too like QB. Before this I was building a SharePoint site for the company and I liked the fact of the limits not being an issue. Need more space-buy more hardware or pay for more room on the cloud server. Nothing thrown away.
I even forgot to add, if you have a time/date field then QB throws away seconds. This is valuable data for my company as we do time series data collection in 15 or 30 second increments. That's a limit that doesn't need to exist-very Y2K to me. I did put a feature request in but there has been zero votes because apparently my company is the only ones that needs this data.
Ever onwards!