Read to bottom:An early version of
[import] was posted July 21, 2014. Similar to the
image onload technique's usage of the user defined variable
[iol], all the details were hidden so that all a user would have to do is specify the
module.js file (which is a
user defined page within QuickBase). The "
import.html" file would likewise be stored as a
user defined page within QuickBase. You could store the "
import.html" file on another domain if
CORS support was enabled. Also, note that this initial version of the
[import] formula would only work in Chrome because it did not load the
polyfill webcomponents.js (previously named platform.js by Google) necessary to make
Web Components work in other browsers.
The original pastie entry is here:
What Is The New QuickBase Hotness? (Import Onload Technique)https://haversineconsulting.quickbase.com/db/bgcwm2m4g?a=dr&rid=313but some unenlightened forum administrator unfamiliar with Web Components deleted my original forum post:
https://quickbase-community.intuit.com/questions/956322 It should be obvious from this info and the articles I posted that this is a bleeding edge technique and I believe it will become extremely useful for use with QuickBase. But there are still details that need to be worked out to make it idiot proof, work in all browsers and integrate seamlessly with QuickBase. Also I need to come up with an outrageous name to draw attention to the new technique.So it might be premature to use it with your current project requirements at this time. I have several prototypes working but there are still some tradeoffs I am looking at to make HTML imports and WebComponents work with QuickBase. If you want to discuss it further feel free to contact me using the information in my profile.