Forum Discussion
MarkCorcoran
8 years agoQrew Cadet
In your suggestion, 1st selection (sort order), would be numbers like 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, ... they wouldn't start with single digit numbers 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , 5. I think this would be confusing to the users.
This is why I though perhaps a different table for each size category, but then comes the possible issue of changing the source for the CDD based on a field selection. (so each size category could start with 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5).
One would think a CDD would be sort-able based on a reference field (like sort order), even though that field is not displayed in the picker.
Thanks
Mark
This is why I though perhaps a different table for each size category, but then comes the possible issue of changing the source for the CDD based on a field selection. (so each size category could start with 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5).
One would think a CDD would be sort-able based on a reference field (like sort order), even though that field is not displayed in the picker.
Thanks
Mark